The intersection exponent for planar random walks

This post continues my series on favorite theorems of the 21st century. For an overview of the categories and my previous selections, see this earlier post. In the category Between the Centuries—that is, theorems proved in the late 20th century but published in the early 21st century—my favorite result in Probability and Statistics is the theorem of Lawler, Schramm, and Werner (Lawler, Schramm, and Werner 2001), which establishes the exact value of the intersection exponent for two simple random walks in the plane.

Let be a sequence of independent, identically distributed vector-valued random variables, each taking values , , , or with equal probability. The process is called a simple random walk on . Despite its elementary definition, this process exhibits remarkably subtle behavior, and several of its most natural quantitative properties resisted analysis for decades.

As an illustration, Erdős and Taylor asked in 1960 how often a planar random walk revisits its most frequently visited site during the first steps. For each lattice point and integer , let be the number of visits to up to time , and define Erdős and Taylor proved that, if the limit exists, then it must lie between and , and they conjectured that it exists almost surely and equals . This conjecture remained open for more than forty years, until it was resolved in 2001 by Dembo, Peres, Rosen, and Zeitouni (Dembo et al. 2001). Their approach first established an analogous result for two-dimensional Brownian motion, confirming a conjecture of Perkins and Taylor, and then transferred it to the discrete setting using invariance principles.

Another fundamental question concerns the likelihood that two independent planar random walks avoid each other. For a walk and integer , write for the (random) set of vertices visited up to time . If the probability decays asymptotically like for some , then is called the intersection exponent. In 1988, Duplantier and Kwon, using methods from theoretical physics and conformal field theory, predicted that for two planar simple random walks one should have . A rigorous proof of this prediction was finally given in 2001 by Lawler, Schramm, and Werner (Lawler, Schramm, and Werner 2001), using the then-new theory of Schramm–Loewner evolution (SLE).

A key input in the proof is an earlier result of Lawler and Puckette (Lawler and Puckette 2000), which shows that the discrete non-intersection probability above is, up to multiplicative constants, comparable to the corresponding probability for two planar Brownian motions. Lawler, Schramm, and Werner then computed the intersection exponents for independent planar Brownian motions, showing that Specializing to yields , confirming the physicists’ prediction and providing one of the earliest striking successes of SLE in probability theory.

References

Dembo, Amir, Yuval Peres, Jay Rosen, and Ofer Zeitouni. 2001. “Thick Points for Planar Brownian Motion and the Erdős–Taylor Conjecture on Random Walk.” Acta Math. 186 (2): 239–70.
Lawler, Gregory F., and Emily E. Puckette. 2000. “The Intersection Exponent for Simple Random Walk.” Combin. Probab. And Comput. 9 (5): 441–64.
Lawler, Gregory F., Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner. 2001. “Values of Brownian Intersection Exponents, II: Plane Exponents.” Acta Math. 187 (2): 275–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392619.

No comment found.

Add a comment

You must log in to post a comment.