vulpeculiar musing 3: smallest counterexample algebra in the variety of bands

In the literature on subvarieties of the variety of bands, there is a series of identities based on equivalences between certain recursively-defined words.

In particular, the -words are defined as , with * indicating the dual - that is, reversal - and the base case , and the -words are defined as , with the base case . Let’s call bands satisfying as -bands.

In particular, consider -bands. Let’s build this up one-by-one:

  • .

Using Mace4, we can observe that the (unique) smallest band which is not a -band is of order two, the (unique) smallest band which is not a -band is of order 5, and the (unique) smallest band which is not a -band is of order 9. What is the order of the smallest band which is not a -band, and is it unique?

Are these smallest counterexamples free algebra?

No comment found.

Add a comment

You must log in to post a comment.